It’s always sad when smart people embarrass themselves by saying stupid things in public. It’s especially sad when someone as smart as insightful as Thomas Friedman takes stupidity to a new level like he does in his
latest column. A wire-to-wire bash-fest aimed at the President, Friedman’s offering is so full of falsehoods it’s remarkable that it passed his paper’s fact-checkers.
Of course, his paper
is the New York Times …
Friedman writes:
For instance, it's unavoidably obvious that we need a real policy of energy conservation. But President Bush can barely choke out the word "conservation." And can you imagine Mr. Cheney, who has already denounced conservation as a "personal virtue" irrelevant to national policy, now leading such a campaign or confronting oil companies for price gouging?I understand and share people’s frustration over $3.00 gasoline. But accusations of “price gouging,” reflect a lack of basic understanding of how our economy in general and our oil supply in particular work. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out in yesterday’s lead
editorial, raising prices in light of increased demand or decreased supply is what keeps the oil flowing. Price ceilings and other government controls will only result in gas lines, since rising prices are a signal to consumers that they need to consume less.
I happen to agree with Friedman that Bush has dropped the ball on long-term energy solutions that sever our dependence on oil, especially the sort that is pumped up from ground owned by Arab states. It’s a matter of national security even more than economics. But this is a mid- and long-term problem. In the short run, the fact that a new oil refinery hasn’t been constructed in the United States needs to be accounted for, and the blame lies squarely at the feet of those on the political left.
Friedman goes on to criticize Bush tax policy advisor Grover Norquist, saying:
I hope he owns property around the New Orleans levee that was never properly finished because of a lack of tax dollars. I hope his basement got flooded. And I hope that he was busy drowning government in his bathtub when the levee broke and that he had to wait for a U.S. Army helicopter to get out of town.Classy. And patently false. The Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says that funding cuts to levee construction programs
did not contribute to the disaster. In fact, one of the sections of the levee that failed was brand new. Moreover, as recently as five months ago, Friedman’s
employer called for cutting the Corps of Engineers’ budget, specifically citing the New Orleans levee project (HT:
Tim Ellsworth). Unfortunately, Friedman’s mind has been made up, so don’t anyone confuse him with, you know, the facts.
So many of the things the Bush team has ignored or distorted under the guise of fighting Osama were exposed by Katrina: its refusal to impose a gasoline tax after 9/11, which would have begun to shift our economy much sooner to more fuel-efficient cars, helped raise money for a rainy day and eased our dependence on the world's worst regimes for energy; its refusal to develop some form of national health care to cover the 40 million uninsured; and its insistence on cutting more taxes, even when that has contributed to incomplete levees and too small an Army to deal with Katrina, Osama and Saddam at the same time.Someone at the times should check and make sure that Friedman isn’t plagiarizing
Kos. In any case, he’s contradicting himself. To Friedman, apparently, it’s an evil conspiracy when events drive the price of gas higher (see earlier complaint about “price gouging”) but it’s perfectly fine for the government to artificially raise gas prices nationwide by imposing a federal gas tax - at the risk of crippling our economy – in order to force people into buying cars with technology that is largely untested, still under development, and doesn’t satisfy the demands of most consumers.
I’m not even going to dignify the comment about nationalized healthcare. I happen to agree that our military is too small, but we have 8 years of cutting by Bill Clinton to thank for that. Iraq and Afghanistan aren’t to blame, as only about
10% of our military is deployed in those two countries combined.
I think the Democrats are having another Wellstone Memorial Service moment in the wake of Katrina. Their unadulterated hatred of Bush and complete lack of original and helpful ideas is on full display. Maybe they’ll regain some of their sanity when Bush leaves office in 2008, but by then it might be too late.